Looking ahead

in Newsletters

Looking ahead in the Rear View Mirror and readers comment on Han Solo’s suggestions

In the rear view mirror, we see the elections fading into the distance. Gone … but not forgotten. Did we accomplish all we had hoped?

No way!

So, what are we doing about it? Well, here in the heartland, our little group that meets monthly to promote Libertarian candidates and causes is already looking forward to the Spring elections.

They come quickly, we recall. As we try to remind our self, our purpose is to not be a debating society. Rather, we are a political party. We identify good candidates and help them get elected to office.

Long-time suffering readers will recall this is a group of dedicated Libertarians inspired by the leadership of a true visionary, Sharon. Our group wants to see the Libertarian agenda promoted in our area. So, we meet monthly to strategize. We now have our agenda for the next three meetings.

At our meeting next week, we will begin to identify potential candidates for office. We will also consider a proposal to develop a mass email list to keep Libertarians across the state informed. Rather than hire a lobbyist to sway the votes of legislators, we will inform the voters about the activities of their elected representatives so they can contact them directly.

Direct lobbying, we expect, will be more effective than “professional” lobbying … and less expensive.

If done correctly, we hope to also be able to identify supporters in every county, city and burg … and every legislative district. Then we can contact and mobilize our supporters quickly when necessary. Future candidates for state-wide races will also be able to use this to get supporters to show up at or to organize rallies.

At our December meeting, we will hear from a man who has managed a number of successful campaigns for office. True, he has some other funny letter after his name, but his heart is in the right place and he is willing to share his expertise and experience with us. If we want to win, we must incorporate proven successful techniques in our efforts.

Then, at our January meeting, we will hear from a sitting legislator who will share insights on the major issues facing our elected tormentors this Spring. Since she is close to the action (and shares our values), we hope she will be an additional set of eyes and ears to let us know when unfavorable or ill-conceived legislation is proposed so we can activate our state-wide volunteer lobbyists through our email channel that we will be setting up.

We weren’t at all happy with the outcome of this election. We aren’t complaining about it. We see a need for an immediate course correction to prevent disappointment in the future. We are taking steps to change our ways.

We don’t expect the voters to come to us; if we want to win, we realize we must go to the voters. We’re not a debating society. We’re a political party. We want to win! We’re going to the voters.

Now for the Weekly TidBits:

* Three readers responded to Han Solo’s suggestions for Constitutional Amendments. In response to Mr. Solo’s 9th point, Dale wrote: “In reality I know many more religious right conservatives that would need the Crayon than I do Liberals.  So your slant in favor of Republicans shows itself here and I certainly do not like it as I do not like Tea Party People, most of them only seem to be able to read large block Crayon letters.  How is that?” … seems pretty clear to us.

* Lelon G. has also read the Constitution. He points out, “OK, I’m amongst the loudest of complainers that the ‘general welfare’ clause is sorely abused, but you might point out to Mr. Solo that the words ‘general welfare’ actually DO occur in Article 1, Section 8, and I quote, in part: ‘The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;’ ”

* And finally Jeffrey A. appreciates Mr. Solo’s suggestion concerning election of Senators that was changed nearly 100 years ago. “When I suggested that senators should be elected by State Governments to represent the State, at the federal level. Libertarian Delegates laughed me off the podium at the State convention in Indiana in 2004. And elected a Candidate that his number one issue was he wanted one class high school basketball.

“I am glad to hear that there is at least one Libertarian that understands. Good luck with that 17th amendment thing,”

* It’s been an interesting week for the Federal Reserve. As the rest of the world savages the Fed’s recent actions, Fed leaders gathered for a celebration … at the scene of the original crime.

“A Return to Jekyll Island: The Origins, History and Future of the Federal Reserve” was the official name of the two-day conclave at the Georgia resort where plans to form the Fed were first hatched in secret this very month 100 years ago. (The Morgan and Rockefeller men in attendance were on a duck-hunting trip, it was claimed at the time.) To learn more about the Fed, read the excellent book, Creature From Jekyll Island.

* Of course, real Fed transparency would come in the form of a full audit. Rep. Ron Paul, for what it’s worth, is promising to press again next year … and he’s sounding confident that unlike 2003 and 2005, the Republican leadership will actually let him chair the subcommittee on domestic monetary policy.

“I will approach that committee like no one has ever approached it because we’re living in times like no one has ever seen,” he said recently.

0 Comments

It’s Your Time: David Nolan

in Libertarian Updates

FOX-11 in Tucson ran this three-minute statement on Sunday; they offered every candidate for a major office the opportunity to do this, but surprisingly few took advantage of it! The media in Arizona give Libertarians better coverage than in most states, partly because we’ve earned it! While you’re on their website, check out the statements by Barry Hess and Steve Stoltz too!

0 Comments

Wasted Votes

in Newsletters

Across the country, as we head into election day, we hear reports of Libertarian candidates who have made a difference in their race. At the same time, voters are looking for candidates who will bring reason to the offices for which they aspire.

In the last election cycle, voters clearly demonstrated they want change … but now they realize they didn’t want the “change” that has been delivered.

Voters want the change Libertarians will bring.

As an example of one candidate’s impact, we received this from David Nolan, one of the founders of the LP, inventor of the World’s Smallest Political Quiz, and candidate for John McCain’s seat in Arizona:

“September 26, 2010 may go down as a turning point in the history of our efforts to restore liberty to America. On that date, I participated in a televised four-way debate among Arizona’s candidate for U.S. Senate – and I won! You can watch the debate online.

“Throughout the debate, John McCain and Rodney Glassman spoke in generalities and platitudes, while I gave hard-hitting, specific, principled answers to each question. And in the online poll conducted by KTVK-3TV, 53% of the people who participated said that I won the debate! This was an unscientific poll, to be sure, but it was open to anyone. My campaign made no attempt to “pack” the vote, because we did not even know that there would be one.

“Think about that for a moment. In a ‘level field’ debate with three other candidates, a Libertarian got a majority of the votes from people who watched and participated in an open poll. The news media did not report this, of course.”

Everywhere, our candidates are helping to shape the debate. With that, we are already making a difference. Wouldn’t it be nice if those 53% actually voted for the candidate they believed “won”?

Don’t forget to vote on Tuesday. Don’t be bashful about suggesting to your friends that they vote for Libertarians. Particularly if polls show a race is not close.

If the polls show that one candidate is well ahead, suggest to your friends that a vote for that candidate or their “R” or “D” opponent is a “wasted” vote since the race is already decided. In such a circumstance, they can vote their conscience and be sure their vote truly gets “counted.”

Explain it this way: if the race is not close (for this illustration, we will assume the Democrat is the presumed winner), a vote for the “D” is wasted since he will win anyway. Likewise, a vote for the “R” is wasted since she will lose anyway. So, to have a vote truly count, one should vote for the “third” party that most closely aligns with their personal beliefs. This because once all the dust settles, and the professionals analyze the results, they will see that the Democrat received, say, 53% of the vote, the Republican 41%, and the various third parties 6%.

What must the “Rs” or “Ds” do; how must they reshape their voter appeal, to bring in that other 6%?

Weekly TidBits:

*Our comment on ethanol in the Weekly TidBits two weeks ago continues to draw comments. Frank G. from Breaux Bridge, LA points out, “You forgot to mention that 10% ethanol causes lots of problems with small engines and costs a lot of money on repair bills. Also not a single small engine is made that can actually use 15% ethanol. If it is made mandatory, all small engine equipment will be useless. No lawnmowers, weedeaters, boat motors, etc. will be useable.”

*We have received many good responses to our musings on a constitutional amendment to improve our Republic. Unless a more pressing issue presents itself, next week, we will look at some of them. If you wish to include your thoughts in this discussion, you can find it here.

0 Comments

Democratic Incumbent Switches to Libertarian Party

in Libertarian Updates

In Clark County, Indiana, incumbent county surveyor Bob Isgrigg has switched his affiliation from Democrat to Libertarian as he runs for re-election this year. Isgrigg has expressed concern about how the county handles its drainage projects, and filed a lawsuit against county officials several years ago.

Read the News and Tribune article about the race.

0 Comments

We miss the honesty of the old timers

in Newsletters

As we head into the home front for this election season, we lament the loss of honest dialog between the various candidates and bid adieu to one of our thoughtful readers before we get to the Weekly TidBits.

With elections only 10 days off, we hear the rhetoric heating up in races across the country. Candidates everywhere are looking for dirt about their opponents. Unfortunately, we don’t hear any reports of Libertarian Candidates being the target of this negative campaigning.

“Good for the Libertarians,” you say. Maybe. It certainly speaks to our character. But, successful politicians seem to live with the motto “I don’t care what they say about me, as long as they spell my name right.”

They recognize the value of public exposure.

We miss the old timers who had the courage of their predilections! To a politician from the great state of Louisiana the following story is attributed:

He called a press conference to reply to allegations that he was spotted consorting with a “known prostitute.”

Holding up the accusing newspaper, he said:

“It says here that I was seen coming out of the Central Hotel at 6 o’clock in the morning after sleeping with a known prostitute. Well, I can tell you that every word of this allegation is a lie.

“It wasn’t the Central Hotel, it was the Downtown Hotel. It wasn’t 6 o’clock in the morning; it was 7 o’clock. She wasn’t a known prostitute; I never laid eyes on her before in my life. And we didn’t sleep a wink.”

Now, that’s uncommon honesty coming from a politician. Clearly, he can be trusted.

Bob responded to our report in the Weekly TidBits last week about the increase in the amount of ethanol in fuel blends from 10% to 15%. We don’t know if Bob objected to our report or our editorializing. If you missed the short comment we made, you can find it at the bottom of last week’s newsletter here.

Bob wrote, “Wow, I found that pretty revealing. A pretty good example of why I have left the so called ‘Libertarian’ party. The above strongly advocates the right wing conservative authortarian [sic] position of the federal government LIMITING the amount of ethanol in gasoline instead of agreeing with ALLOWING more ethanol in gasoline and letting the market decide. Or perhaps yours is a left wing socialist agenda to protect us from the dangers of ethanol because we are too stupid to decide for ourselves. Either way, yours is not the a position of principle anymore, yours is going with whatever you think will attract the most votes or support. Knee jerk opposition to anything the Obama administration does, even if they are actually promoting liberty.

“By the way, please stop sending me emails promoting your pro-government anti-liberty positions.”

We accommodated Bob’s request. We also responded:

Bob –

What you advocate, letting the market decide, is exactly what we are interested in. Regular gasoline is no longer easy to find. We usually only find gas with 10% ethanol. Evidently, now the government is encouraging or permitting increasing that to 15%. We wonder why such a decision is made by the Government? This doesn’t sound to us like the free market.

In addition, the only way this ethanol additive makes it in the marketplace is because of a government subsidy. Otherwise, we understand, the cost of converting food to fuel is too expensive to compete with traditional fuels. This doesn’t sound like the free market, either.

We believe in the free market. We believe in the combined wisdom of individuals acting in furtherance of their personal best interests. We believe this is best accomplished if the government leaves the marketplace alone.

We are fascinated that you hedge your bet when you allow “perhaps yours is a left wing socialist agenda” instead of the “right wing conservative authortarian [sic] position” you first criticized.

In any event, actually we are not running for office so we aren’t trying to “attract the most votes or support”. Rather, we are an equal-opportunity cynic. We find folly in both the current White House resident and his equally Statist predecessor, whom we dubbed “George III” (which he was).

For the record, we don’t make or declare policy for the Libertarian Party. Our weekly newsletter speaks only for our self. We’re glad that it raised some discussion, in this instance. We are fascinated that you choose to criticize, name-call, and disengage rather than debate.

Thank you for your email. We will use it in this week’s newsletter. As you requested, we will not send it to you. We understand you consider yourself an “Independent”. We are never sure how this translates into moving policy forward but we respect your efforts.

Weekly TidBits:

*The Fed was formed in 1913. In the 100 years before the Fed was formed, the dollar lost not a penny of its value. In the almost 100 years since, it has lost almost all of them. If the greenback were to lose another 5% of its 1914 value, there would be nothing left at all. You can learn much more about the Fed in the book, Creature from Jekyll Island available here.

*For quite some time, “Fair Traders” have wanted the Chinese to revalue their currency. This, they believe, will somehow help our trade imbalance. Exactly how they know what China’s currency should be worth in a free market is a mystery to us.

0 Comments